Historic Vote on Universal Basic Income Proposal Scheduled

Coreanos Videos Porno(Porn website:777888sex.cc)dBW Breakthrough in Cancer Research Brings New Hope for Patients

**BEIJING, Feb. 25 (Xinhua) —** The Supreme People's Court released the 21st batch of six guiding cases on February 25, all of which involve disputes related to the "Belt and Road" Initiative. These cases are intended to guide courts at all levels in handling similar cases during future adjudications. Guiding Case No. 107, *Sinochem International (Singapore) Co., Ltd. v. Thyssenkrupp Metallurgical Products GmbH*, provides clarity on the applicable law in international sales contracts and the interpretation of fundamental breaches under the United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods (CISG). The case sets an important precedent for resolving similar disputes in international goods sales contracts. Guiding Case No. 108, *Zhejiang Longda Stainless Steel Co., Ltd. v. A.P. Moller-Maersk A/S*, addresses the issue of contract changes in maritime transport. It clarifies that a carrier may refuse a consignor’s request for port change or cargo return if fulfilling the request would significantly impact the carrier’s operations. However, the carrier must promptly notify the consignor of the reason for non-execution. This case offers practical guidance for balancing the rights and obligations of all parties in international maritime transport contracts, thereby supporting a stable shipping trade environment. Guiding Case No. 109, *Anhui Foreign Economic Construction (Group) Co., Ltd. v. Dongfang Real Estate Co., Ltd.*, provides important standards on the fraud exception in independent guarantees. It outlines limited review principles and exceptions, offering substantial guidance for courts handling fraud cases involving independent guarantees. Guiding Case No. 110, *South China Sea Rescue Bureau of the Ministry of Transport v. Achangross Investment Co. and Hong Kong Anda Oson Co. Shanghai Representative Office*, clarifies that in cases where neither the 1989 International Salvage Convention nor China’s Maritime Law provides specific provisions for employment salvage contracts, China’s Contract Law can be applied to determine the rights and obligations of the parties. The decision resolves key legal issues in maritime salvage contract disputes and offers clear legal rules for similar cases. Guiding Case No. 111, *China Construction Bank Guangzhou Liwan Sub-branch v. Guangdong Lanyue Energy Development Co., Ltd.*, resolves key questions about the property rights of bills of lading and the rights of bill holders. This case is pivotal in standardizing the legal application of these principles and serves as a benchmark for the sector. Guiding Case No. 112, *Astec Co., Ltd.’s Application for Establishment of a Maritime Compensation Liability Limitation Fund*, sets out criteria for determining single and multiple incidents in the establishment of maritime liability limitation funds. The ruling helps regulate maritime navigation order and protect the legitimate rights of aquaculture farmers, offering specific legal standards for adjudicating similar cases. (End)